-
Website
http://publishing2.com/ -
Original page
http://publishing2.com/2007/02/09/top-ten-things-that-suck-about-google-docs/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
siliconbits
1 comment · 2 points
-
Ike Pigott
16 comments · 73 points
-
MariSmith
1 comment · 20 points
-
Don Lafferty
1 comment · 3 points
-
webomatica
5 comments · 5 points
-
-
Popular Threads
I wish they would incorporate instant messaging (like Gmail). Sometimes I want to discuss a section in real time with my other collaborators.
As far at the offline acces goes, I normally just export it to Excel or word when I know I'll be out of net access areas and then re-import when I'm back online. A bit of a pain but at least I can then access my docs.
Personally I find the product handy, mostly because its an easy way to keep documents synced between the multiple computers I work on (and the Gmail integration is sweet). Mostly I just write with it though and treat it as an online text editor - formatting is just too basic and too unwieldy to be of any use. For that stuff I just drop the text into the equally free openoffice.org
Maybe Google doesn't have any QA, or Macs. Or maybe, accustomed as we are to 10th generation desktop word processors, we've forgotten how primitive most new tools are.
Offline access means using the same application on the same document. Remembering to save it as a Microsoft Word document before you head to the airport is NOT offline access. I don't have to remember to do anything with my Word files to access them offline.
I agree that it's a "handy" product, but it's got a ways to go.
Not a fan.
Ryan
I really wish they would incorporate that the Format Painter, which you can use to select a piece of text and "copy" the qualities of that text (e.g. bold, centered, font size, etc.) and apply them to another piece of text. I find this the most useful tool on Microsoft applications and have asked for it multiple times, but still never received a response.
We never expected this, but they've revolutionized our business:
- we're moving all our employees to web based aps to cut our IT requirements. Our main publishing system (financial content) is web based, so everyone needs to be online all the time anyway. We now don't need to purchase MS Office for most employees, and that saves us a ton of money.
- The collaboration of Google Docs has massively raised our efficiency. We just uploaded our phone directory as a Google spreadsheet, and everyone updates their own info themselves. We just worked collaboratively in a Google doc on a press release announcing our China coverage, and it saved us hours.
- Integration with Gmail is key. We get articles submitted to us via email, and instead of having to download an attachment and then open it, gmail plus Google docs allows our editors to open it immediately.
- We're even sharing docs with customers (people who sponsor our free conference call transcripts). We put together a pricing spreadsheet containing various customized purchase options, and they can play with it.
We've also noticed many of the drawbacks you mentioned (thank you for summarizing them so succinctly!), and we'd really like to see them fixed. But even now, Google docs are providing a huge productivity boost and cost saving to us.
I tried several times to publish a document as PDF with images in it. And it keeps shrinking the images down to about 1/5 the size.
And that really sucks!
Using Google docs would have solved several key problems. Knowing whateveryone is using, that they all had access to the same tools, a centralised place for the templates, and revisions etc. It was just too good to pass up trying.
Well, try I did. Several wasted hours later, its just not going to work. The avrage uses will be hopless messing with this. My bigest problem was print vs. screen view. Just not working. Manageing tables within Google Docs was pointless.
What a shame. Give them another couple years, and it may have some value. They simply should have left it in beta. Its going to turn a lot of people off.